I’ve been seeing many articles about Industry 4.0. I don’t like the “.0”.
Industry 1 was straight-up industrialization- steam power, water power, whatever.
Two was electricity.
Three was human-led automation.
Four is self-guided automation.
There, wasn’t that easy? Did you notice we didn’t need the “.0” at all.
When industry 3 came about there was a popularization or recognition of release numbers, e.g. Windows NT 3.51, and this played nicely into the automation scenario. It was a cute play-on-words. However, we never saw Industry 3.1. We don’t need it. It’s facetious to continue using decimal values to describe our Industry, if we never delve into the depths to differentiate deeper. I’d like to see something like:
Causes: There might be diverse purposes behind levitra 40 mg this condition. So, click this link cialis properien it is all about the sluggish blood supply or impaired blood flow. In fact, surveys have found that more men are opting for soft Kamagra Tablets as it is chewable and makes it easier to consume for buying viagra in australia those who are not a fan of medicinal tablets in general. Moreover, gallbladder surgery does not relieve the biliary pain in 10%-33% of the individuals with http://twomeyautoworks.com/?attachment_id=248 viagra uk detected gallstones.Industry 4.1: Automated monitoring of equipment for reporting and analysis.
4.2: Automated equipment control tied to the automated monitoring; possibly interconnections to feed and output machines. Automated production schedules to meet demand.
4.3 Automated supply chain, to drive customer orders down to supplier orders.
4.4 Automated executive reporting? Marketing?
4.5 Automation of the research channel?
If we add value to the Industry 4.x decimals, then I’m all in to continue using them. Otherwise, I’m ready to drop the smirk-inducing buzzword “.0”.